12/29/2023 0 Comments Don carbonIn a statement in June, the regulator and the Emissions Reduction Assurance Committee said Macintosh and his colleagues had failed to present robust evidence of a lack of integrity in the system and – as the precise areas of land where carbon credit projects took place could not be released due to legal restrictions – had based their analysis on an incomplete dataset.Ĭhubb is due to report back by the end of the year. The Clean Energy Regulator has rejected the criticisms. The climate change minister, Chris Bowen, has said carbon credits were vital to reduce emissions and appointed a former chief scientist, Prof Ian Chubb, to oversee a review of the system. It is now time for them to lend their voices to the calls for change.” “We know there are multiple other market participants and scientists that agree with what we are saying and what GreenCollar is now saying. “There really is no argument now for the government not to act,” he said. He said it reflected “very poorly” on the Clean Energy Regulator and the Emissions Reduction Assurance Committee. Macintosh said the joint statement “reflected very well” on GreenCollar and, after the statement by major landfill gas project owners, was the latest in a string of big players that “had the courage and character” to publicly acknowledge change was needed. They have been providing me, my friends and my family with delicious charcoal grilled chickens for. Third, they said the model used to estimate how much carbon dioxide was stored in regenerating forests was not calibrated for use in areas that already had significant amounts of vegetation and could lead to overestimation of emissions reductions. 6215 Upper Valley Rd El Paso TX 79932 (915) 243-4065. Second, the two parties said the Clean Energy Regulator had too many roles and was potentially conflicted, and called for its powers to advise government and prepare methods under which carbon credits were created to be given to other agencies. Sign up to receive an email with the top stories from Guardian Australia every morning Both said land-based projects could also have environmental and social benefits, including improving biodiversity and employment in regional areas.īut they identified three “fundamental problems”.įirst, they said the legislation overseeing carbon credits, which was relaxed under the Coalition, did not ensure all methods used to create carbon offsets met high integrity standards. The joint submission said both parties had deep experience in carbon and environmental markets and supported the use of carbon offsets, preferably in conjunction with an effective carbon pricing scheme.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |